cod infinite warfare vs battlefield 1 multiplayer review

By and large, Call of Duty's Warfare line has always maintained the slightest bit grounded, never quite leaping into the distant future by this much.īut the leap is a success, underachieving tradition of Michael Bay films be damned. It all adds up to the finest Call of Duty game yet, and it comes from the riskiest package. The lone shortcoming of Zombies is that, on occasion, it can take awhile to find a suitable match, but Infinity Ward tries to preemptively address that issue: You can play the mode solo if you want or even in split screen. Zombies, essentially as an addition to the Infinite Warfare package. If you are looking for a fresh and new experience Battlefield 1 is for you, the setting which Battlefield 1 offers is WW1 trench warfare, something yet to be explored by other First-person shooters. A series of unlockables complete the Zombies package, practically making it Activision's answer to Plants vs. Battlefield 1 is much better than COD: Infinite Warfare this year, no doubt about that, but what I would reccomend you. Zombies becomes a balancing act, as you fight away zombies but also try to unlock new sections to enrich the variety of the experience.

You're not simply keeping zombies from entering boarded-up areas: Gradually, you'll be able to unlock areas of the park, extending the area you must protect and opening new options with which to kill zombies. This year, it feels a bit like the developer decided to take its biggest risks in the campaign, while playing it very safe on the multiplayer front.

Cod infinite warfare vs battlefield 1 multiplayer review